Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ozzy's avatar

There are several aspects of the Valdez decision that I have issue with.

That Valdez has tested negative on other tests, apart from being irrelevant to THIS test, does NOT in no way indicate that he's a clean fighter in a sport where the drug testing protocols are so pathetic eg: commission testing is poor, it's usually done at the wrong time and they don't test for everything, the WBC CBP is grossly underfunded and doesn't do anywhere near the number of tests needed for a good random testing protocol and it now transpires that enrolling in it does not commit you to the VADA banned list at all.

Even if we accept that the stimulant Phentermine only helps to suppress appetite, which I strongly suspect isn't the case, then isn't using this to drop pounds an unfair advantage over an opponent trying to drop weight naturally?

Also as Valdez accepts he was using Phentermine he will have known that he was gonna be popped when VADA took the sample on August 13th and so of course he stopped taking it after that just in case VADA returned - so imo the negative August 30th sample simply confirms that Valdez knew he'd been caught. The negative July 22nd sample simply shows Valdez hadn't starting using Phentermine yet - big deal.

The WBC ruling imo reads like the WBC committee and Team Valdez gathered in a room and brain-stormed "how many excuses can we make so that Oscar can be let off the hook?".

What is the point of the WBC CBP if a fighter admits to taking a drug on the VADA banned list but gets off because the local commission recognises the weaker WADA banned list?

Also Dan writes that "the WBC controls only the title, but has no authority to suspend a fighter or stop a fight." - I have to say that I find that hard to believe.

How then has the WBC suspended other fighters in the past that have been popped for a drug eg: Povetkin, Dillian Whyte, David Benavidez etc.

As far as I'm aware the WBC stopped the Wilder vs Povetkin WBC heavyweight world title fight from taking place in Russia while it took the time to come to a decision on Povetkin's case and eventually they suspended Povetkin, issued him with a $250K fine which they pocketed with nothing going to the WBC CBP.

Also if the WBC can't suspend a fighter or stop a fight - then how is it that, in a very similar situation to the Valdez affair, the WBO stripped Saunders of his WBO160lb title which cancelled his forthcoming fight with Andrade and suspended Saunders for 6 months (the fact that Saunders was let back in earlier being irrelevant to the WBO's power to do it), does the WBO have more power over its fighters than the WBC?

The whole affair stinks to high heaven but hopefully it will show boxing fans once and for all that the WBC is not serious about getting rid of drugs in boxing.

Sorry about the rant but I can't believe that the WBC can ignore its own anti-doping rules.

Expand full comment
AnEnglishmanInLA's avatar

I've been around boxing since the 70s and think this is certainly one of the most worrying times for the sport. The main problem? Financial greed:-

The best won't [or aren't allowed - by broadcasters and/or promoters and/or managers] to fight the best unless the sums are astronomical. Hence the schedule is so poor.

Among the biggest bucks are paid to youtubers [I don't buy the 'bringing more eyes to the sport' rhetoric - how many of these fans will tune in for the Lara/Warrington card?].

Similar for the old-timers [who really wants to see De La Hoya in the ring after what he's put himself through over the years? He needs addiction help]. And at 59 years old next month and with countless wars on his resume, Holyfield should only be in a boxing ring as a trainer or referee.

Crazy amount of belts - franchise, regular, super, interim, continental, intercontinental, ring, lineal, 4 governing bodies. And how many weight classes?

Then of course there's the peds nonsense. Certain trainers have been regularly linked to suspicious activity or irregular results. Names such as Fury, Joshua, Whyte, Alvarez [all active and at the top of the paydays] have either tested positive or had issues with TUEs. The people who control boxing or influence views about it [broadcasters, trainers, promoters, journalists, 'governing' bodies, etc won't do anything about it. Why? $$$

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts