6 Comments

Agree. Before, it was like whatever, but NOW.....Let's go!! #teamserrano ๐ŸฅŠ๐ŸฅŠ๐ŸฅŠ

Expand full comment

This card now has my full attention ..

Expand full comment

Thought Serrano won the first time although close.

Expand full comment

On one side I'm really looking forward to this fight, the first one was very entertaining.

On the other side I'm disappointed. Cameron deserves the trilogy fight and Nina Meinke deserves the fight that Serrano's hair job canceled. Also, money talks and apparently Serrano's virtues walk when it comes to 12x3 rounds.

Expand full comment

1. Cameron trilogy still possible. I have no issue with her not fighting the same opponent three times in a row. The third fight will be there.

2. Meinke was paid in full despite not having the fight. And you dont fight her when there's a massive fight with Taylor to be made.

3. Serrano, as she stated, is not the champion in this fight. Taylor gets to call the shots. She wants to avenge her loss, have a chance to become a two-division undisputed champion AND make her biggest payday. Easy decision.

Expand full comment

I'm not disputing any of that dan. Meinke got paid but what would a win over Serrano do for her career? It was canceled at no fault of her own. Cameron gave taylor not 1 but 2 cracks at her title and they were both close fights. I know Taylor is the draw but I also remember plenty of folks wanting ggg-canelo to go 3 in a row and the draw (canelo) got crapped on for making the trilogy wait so long. And come on with the being challenger stuff. Is she going to respect the champ Nicolson's wishes or are we going to split hairs on championship status. I get why the fight is happening its just disappointing a little to me who and what is being relegated to make it happen.

Expand full comment